Stuttle gone

Post Reply
Cph.shots
Posts: 1665
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Cph.shots »

I get it as regards to favourites but and certainly with regards to a certain midfielder but two new loan defenders have come in and got game time.
Maybe the tu/place isn't quite right for JS and its no one"fault".
brian bloomfield
Posts: 600
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:00 am
Location: London
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by brian bloomfield »

It will be interesting to see how Stuttles contribution will effect Farnboroughs push for promotion which has slightly faltered of late. Some juicy matches coming up for them.
SteveyAsp
Co-owner
Co-owner
Posts: 841
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:21 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by SteveyAsp »

Wouldn't some communication from the Chairman and Manager be a great thing for the football club
Old Bob
Posts: 4695
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:23 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Old Bob »

beechcroft wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:10 pm
redandbluescb wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:54 pm Everybody has opinions on different players but we have a manager who has favourites
that is plain too see.
If TW is playing his favourites which in turn means he is not necessarilly playing his strongest 11 available each game,(which i think most of us agree he is not) then the only sensible conclusion is that he cannot have the clubs best interests at heart.
We can't be 100% sure this is what he is doing each game, but if i was a betting man ............Questions must surley be floating around the boardroom as to whether this is the case
While I am sympathetic to your point of view, I don't think your logic stands up. It is perfectly possible that Tommy thinks in his own mind that he is playing his strongest 11. That's why they are his favourites, because Tommy believes they are part of his group of "strongest" players. Few would agree, but maybe that's how he sees things.
Alex
Posts: 3301
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:56 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Alex »

SteveyAsp wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:44 pm Wouldn't some communication from the Manager be a great thing for the football club
Good luck.

Another record and repeat pre match interview this week!

🥱
Birdman
Co-owner
Co-owner
Posts: 5861
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:47 am
Location: Aldershot
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Birdman »

redblueuptoyou wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:49 pm
Silasgoldeen wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:19 pm Not a word on the pre match video
Not even a token ‘thanks for his efforts and good luck’?
This link could’ve (should’ve) been included in the opening post then your comment wouldn’t have been required :- https://www.theshots.co.uk/player-recal ... y-stuttle/
“The benefit of hindsight can be a wonderful thing.”
Silasgoldeen
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 1:41 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Silasgoldeen »

based on his first few minutes at Aldershot I thought he was going to be a real difference maker, like it'd almost be unfair we had him. Class touch, big, strong, fast enough, and based on youtube, can definitely finish. I assume Farnborough will now see the same.

I think the club should've at least mentioned all this. Could've just said that they were happy with Barham's play, wanted to bring on Stuttle slowly with a view to using him more down the stretch, or something. They're going to need another loanee now for depth if nothing else.
Silasgoldeen
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 1:41 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by Silasgoldeen »

Old Bob wrote: Fri Jan 31, 2025 7:35 am
beechcroft wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:10 pm
redandbluescb wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:54 pm Everybody has opinions on different players but we have a manager who has favourites
that is plain too see.
If TW is playing his favourites which in turn means he is not necessarilly playing his strongest 11 available each game,(which i think most of us agree he is not) then the only sensible conclusion is that he cannot have the clubs best interests at heart.
We can't be 100% sure this is what he is doing each game, but if i was a betting man ............Questions must surley be floating around the boardroom as to whether this is the case
While I am sympathetic to your point of view, I don't think your logic stands up. It is perfectly possible that Tommy thinks in his own mind that he is playing his strongest 11. That's why they are his favourites, because Tommy believes they are part of his group of "strongest" players. Few would agree, but maybe that's how he sees things.
I think this is obviously true. I think it's taken them a while to work out what they want from this team but for all the naysaying, they have been playing quite well for a while now. (it's not just me, Rob W says this all the time on his podcast and he's been around the block a few times and knows the leagues). The points haven't come but to my mind this is a mid-table team that's on the wrong side of the variance every football club experiences.

The problem is that Tommy seems to want a high variance game and so has to accept some share of the blame for weird results. The best teams to the EBB this season have scored goals and shut up shop, whereas we keep playing this pinball football which means we have it in us to beat anyone but leaves us open to conceding at any moment, hence all the 2-2 draws etc. They tightened things up in the autumn but found we couldn't score.
brian bloomfield
Posts: 600
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:00 am
Location: London
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by brian bloomfield »

The management team should always know what they want from this team. There's no doubt they like to change things up which of course you would do for different styles of operartional play.

Recent results have been very promising and throughout the season so far, to be fair many draws could easily have gone either way.

Getting excited for Saturday and our onwards march to Wembley.
beechcroft
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2023 9:20 pm
Location: Tarpon Springs FL.
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by beechcroft »

Old Bob wrote: Fri Jan 31, 2025 7:35 am
beechcroft wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:10 pm
redandbluescb wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:54 pm Everybody has opinions on different players but we have a manager who has favourites
that is plain too see.
If TW is playing his favourites which in turn means he is not necessarilly playing his strongest 11 available each game,(which i think most of us agree he is not) then the only sensible conclusion is that he cannot have the clubs best interests at heart.
We can't be 100% sure this is what he is doing each game, but if i was a betting man ............Questions must surley be floating around the boardroom as to whether this is the case
While I am sympathetic to your point of view, I don't think your logic stands up. It is perfectly possible that Tommy thinks in his own mind that he is playing his strongest 11. That's why they are his favourites, because Tommy believes they are part of his group of "strongest" players. Few would agree, but maybe that's how he sees things.
Fair point ob,but if TW thinks by playing Jr over at least 2 others ,because he thinks Jr is stronger, then we do have a problem.
I am not one to slag off individual players, but i would imagine 99%on here would argue that Jr is not the strongest, and i do think TW knows this, but still insists on playing him,so i would argue he is not playing his srongest 11 due to his favourites.
CH
Posts: 3748
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: Aldershot
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by CH »

The blind spots with Theo, Maghoma, JVS and Mullins really seem to defy logic.
A Shot from Wales
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:11 am
Location: Exmoor, north Devon and Wales
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by A Shot from Wales »

CH wrote: Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:05 am The blind spots with Theo, Maghoma, JVS and Mullins really seem to defy logic.
Jimmy Greaves suffered a bad cut in the last group game against France and was replaced by Geoff Hurst for the quarter final challenge of Argentina. Jimmy was everyone’s favourite, and with 44 goals in only 50 odd games for England he was probably the greatest goal scorer of my lifetime.

But Alf picked teams to win games. He was certainly like Tommy in that he was obdurate, and always ignored the opinion of others. However, unlike Tommy, he was a good manager. In fact for the job in hand, probably the best.
shots1965
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: Oklahoma USA
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by shots1965 »

JG what a player he was…the very best England ever had
Shame there’s not too many YouTube clips of him


Never blasted the ball … passed the ball into the net

R.I.P Jimmy

Legend
redblueuptoyou
Posts: 3806
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 1:52 pm
Re: Stuttle gone

Post by redblueuptoyou »

Birdman wrote: Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:02 am
redblueuptoyou wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:49 pm
Silasgoldeen wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:19 pm Not a word on the pre match video
Not even a token ‘thanks for his efforts and good luck’?
This link could’ve (should’ve) been included in the opening post then your comment wouldn’t have been required :- https://www.theshots.co.uk/player-recal ... y-stuttle/
Feels like TW could have said it in person? Think we’ve always talked about players who have left in the past?

Post Reply