Stuttle gone
Re: Stuttle gone
I get it as regards to favourites but and certainly with regards to a certain midfielder but two new loan defenders have come in and got game time.
Maybe the tu/place isn't quite right for JS and its no one"fault".
Maybe the tu/place isn't quite right for JS and its no one"fault".
-
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:00 am
- Location: London
Re: Stuttle gone
It will be interesting to see how Stuttles contribution will effect Farnboroughs push for promotion which has slightly faltered of late. Some juicy matches coming up for them.
Re: Stuttle gone
Wouldn't some communication from the Chairman and Manager be a great thing for the football club
Re: Stuttle gone
While I am sympathetic to your point of view, I don't think your logic stands up. It is perfectly possible that Tommy thinks in his own mind that he is playing his strongest 11. That's why they are his favourites, because Tommy believes they are part of his group of "strongest" players. Few would agree, but maybe that's how he sees things.beechcroft wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:10 pmIf TW is playing his favourites which in turn means he is not necessarilly playing his strongest 11 available each game,(which i think most of us agree he is not) then the only sensible conclusion is that he cannot have the clubs best interests at heart.redandbluescb wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:54 pm Everybody has opinions on different players but we have a manager who has favourites
that is plain too see.
We can't be 100% sure this is what he is doing each game, but if i was a betting man ............Questions must surley be floating around the boardroom as to whether this is the case
Re: Stuttle gone
https://www.theshots.co.uk/player-recal ... y-stuttle/redblueuptoyou wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:49 pmNot even a token ‘thanks for his efforts and good luck’?
“The benefit of hindsight can be a wonderful thing.”