Pat Nash
-
- Co-owner
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:54 am
- Location: Alton
Re: Pat Nash
Guess that means Jordi's fit again?
'Players lose you games, not tactics. There's so much crap talked about tactics by people who barely know how to win at dominoes. ' Brian Clough
Re: Pat Nash
According to the match report he was one of the substitutes.
“The benefit of hindsight can be a wonderful thing.”
-
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 6:24 pm
Re: Pat Nash
Suprised farnham ain't moaning yet that he never went back there on loan.
Re: Pat Nash
I think it will be to play at a slightly higher level?
Perhaps he will be busier at Sholing as well....
Perhaps he will be busier at Sholing as well....
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2023 5:09 pm
Re: Pat Nash
Pat in hindsight should have stayed at Farnham. Aldershot arn’t exactly coming up smelling of roses over the way they’ve treated the lad either, and now offloading him to Sholing and probably getting him back only again to sit on the bench.
Re: Pat Nash
He will get far more experience playing at Sholing, that is what its about really? Goalkeepers don't always pick up much experience playing for the best in the league. He was always going there and only held up due to JVS injury.charles2004 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:30 am Pat in hindsight should have stayed at Farnham. Aldershot arn’t exactly coming up smelling of roses over the way they’ve treated the lad either, and now offloading him to Sholing and probably getting him back only again to sit on the bench.
-
- Co-owner
- Posts: 7548
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:12 pm
- Location: Farnborough
Re: Pat Nash
In what way have we treated him badly ????charles2004 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:30 am Pat in hindsight should have stayed at Farnham. Aldershot arn’t exactly coming up smelling of roses over the way they’ve treated the lad either, and now offloading him to Sholing and probably getting him back only again to sit on the bench.
We loaned him out to Farnham so that he would get game time rather than sitting in the stands watching the games, which I would imagine he was very happy to do. When Jordi got injured we called him back to cover which is exactly how loans work and I am sure he would have been very disappointed if he had not been recalled. So re your last comment about calling him back to sit on the bench if Jordi were to get injured again or Marcus got injured and Jordi was playing then absolutely 100% we should call Pat back again and rightly so.
The old saying goes "You can please some of the people some of the time, but you will never please all the people all the time." In fact sometimes it seems impossible to even please some of the people any of the time
-
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Re: Pat Nash
Am I missing something here as I as though Sholing are playing at a higher level than Farnham so that can only be good for his development.charles2004 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:30 am Pat in hindsight should have stayed at Farnham. Aldershot arn’t exactly coming up smelling of roses over the way they’ve treated the lad either, and now offloading him to Sholing and probably getting him back only again to sit on the bench.
The club haven't treated him badly either.
“All religion is a foolish answer to a foolish question.” – Thomas Shelby
Re: Pat Nash
He’ll never be Shots number one.
-
- Co-owner
- Posts: 7548
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:12 pm
- Location: Farnborough
Re: Pat Nash
"Never" is perhaps a bit too definite but "Not in the foreseeable future" I would certainly agree with, he has a fair way to go yet in gaining experience and seeing what standard he can get to which I assume is your thinking.
The old saying goes "You can please some of the people some of the time, but you will never please all the people all the time." In fact sometimes it seems impossible to even please some of the people any of the time
Re: Pat Nash
Well yes, the above. But also he’s very unlikely to take the place of Dewhurst!Richard Petty wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:30 pm"Never" is perhaps a bit too definite but "Not in the foreseeable future" I would certainly agree with, he has a fair way to go yet in gaining experience and seeing what standard he can get to which I assume is your thinking.
-
- Co-owner
- Posts: 7548
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:12 pm
- Location: Farnborough
Re: Pat Nash
If your only referring to while Marcus is with us then your right, my hesitation over your use of the word "Never" was based on sometime in the long term future when maybe Marcus will have moved on and Pat has potentially developed as a keeper.Alex wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:37 pmWell yes, the above. But also he’s very unlikely to take the place of Dewhurst!Richard Petty wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:30 pm"Never" is perhaps a bit too definite but "Not in the foreseeable future" I would certainly agree with, he has a fair way to go yet in gaining experience and seeing what standard he can get to which I assume is your thinking.
The old saying goes "You can please some of the people some of the time, but you will never please all the people all the time." In fact sometimes it seems impossible to even please some of the people any of the time
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2018 12:35 pm
- Location: Christchurch
Re: Pat Nash
Don't understand why we signed him in the first place, I agree with Alex not much chance of him being a number one for us, so unless he wants to be on the bench he would be better off somewhere else. I think he just too small for a keeper in the National League.